Challenges to science communication in a post-truth World

Introduction

Detached Rationality versus Contextual Rationality

The Failure of Facts, and Challenges to Truth

Skepticism versus Hyperskepticism[1]

Democratised expertise and the “Easiness Effect”

Guidelines for communicating science

Conclusions

References

Footnotes

--

--

--

Jacques Rousseau lectures critical thinking & ethics (University of Cape Town), and co-authored “Critical Thinking, Science and Pseudoscience” (Springer 2016).

Love podcasts or audiobooks? Learn on the go with our new app.

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store
Synapses

Synapses

Jacques Rousseau lectures critical thinking & ethics (University of Cape Town), and co-authored “Critical Thinking, Science and Pseudoscience” (Springer 2016).

More from Medium

3 Philosophical Questions We Should Ask Ourselves Regularly

The Philosophy of Self-Improvement: Possibly Irrational?

Life is slow suicide and we should acknowledge it

Charade of Intelligence